Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on 1 source
In the spring of 1972, a 37-year-old woman named Erma Lou Struthers, also known by her maiden name, Barnett, vanished from a park in San Jose, California. She was last seen on May 1st of that year in the downtown green space of St. James Park. At the time of her disappearance, Erma was described as a Caucasian female, 5'7" tall and weighing 165 pounds, with shoulder-length brown hair and blue eyes. A small mole on the right side of her back was a distinguishing feature. The sparse details available about that day offer no insight into what she was doing in the park or who, if anyone, she may have been with, leaving the moments before she went missing a painful mystery.

Erma's life before her disappearance held the threads of a large family and significant personal changes. In 1951, she married Ralph Charles Struthers, and together they had seven daughters. Their marriage ended in divorce in June of 1966, roughly six years before she went missing. Online forums frequented by those interested in cold cases have mentioned the possibility that Erma may have been grappling with schizophrenia and had been institutionalized at some point, though these details remain unconfirmed by official sources. This part of her history, if true, adds a layer of vulnerability to her story and raises further questions about the circumstances leading to her disappearance.

Decades have passed since Erma Lou Struthers was last seen, and her case has grown cold, leaving her seven daughters with unanswered questions. The investigation into her disappearance is officially handled by the Placer County Sheriff's Office, a detail that is somewhat unusual given that she was last seen in Santa Clara County. The reasons for this jurisdictional arrangement are not publicly documented. The official records provide no clothing description or any personal items she may have had with her. The narrative of Erma's life—a mother of seven who was divorced and possibly facing mental health challenges—fades into a series of unknowns on that spring day in 1972. Her case is a quiet but persistent reminder of the many individuals who have vanished, leaving behind families to navigate a world with an empty space and the enduring hope for answers.

Last Seen: May 1, 1972

Links to Additional Sources (1)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

77%Possible
Jane Doe — California
UP60119 • Found Aug 4, 1986
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 38–52 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5"–5'8" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%130–155 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Los Angeles, California - unidentified case UP80466
Jane Doe — Los Angeles, California
UP80466 • Found Apr 26, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 50–60 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 49 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3"–5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 78%115–130 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Sacramento, California - unidentified case UP12981
Jane Doe — Sacramento, California
UP12981 • Found Nov 29, 1986
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 40–60 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Weight 82%134 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue
76%Possible
Jane Doe — California - unidentified case UP4448
Jane Doe — California
UP4448 • Found Aug 20, 1976
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 68%5'2"–5'4" vs 5'7"
Weight 90%115–140 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
Jane Doe — San Diego, California - unidentified case UP92621
Jane Doe — San Diego, California
UP92621 • Found Apr 29, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 40–50 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 50 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%157 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 30%Hazel vs Blue
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Newark, California - unidentified case UP53306
Jane Doe — Newark, California
UP53306 • Found Oct 24, 1985
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 28–42 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 13 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6"–5'8" vs 5'7"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Palm Desert, California - unidentified case UP7026
Jane Doe — Palm Desert, California
UP7026 • Found Feb 10, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 25 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 96%145 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 30%Hazel vs Blue
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Keyes, California
UP13028 • Found Apr 27, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 45–55 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 12 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 55%115 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 30%Hazel vs Blue
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Los Angeles, California - unidentified case UP4332
Jane Doe — Los Angeles, California
UP4332 • Found Aug 21, 1981
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 30–50 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'1"–5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 36%104 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Calabasas Highlands, California
UP4424 • Found Sep 3, 1978
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 84%5'5" vs 5'7"
Weight 30%100 lb vs 165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.