Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP51221) and 1 other source
Elias Zet Par, a 20-year-old male, was last seen on June 16, 2017, near McAllen, Texas. Limited details are available about his disappearance, but he was reported missing after he was last seen in a remote area of the Texas desert. His case is registered in NamUs (National Missing and Unidentified Persons System), and his family and authorities have been seeking information that could help locate him.

There has been no substantial progress in the investigation, and his case remains unsolved. As with many missing persons cases in the border regions of Texas, individuals like Elias are often at risk due to the challenging environment and other factors. Authorities are asking the public to come forward with any information that might lead to a breakthrough in his case.
Last Seen: Jun 16, 2017

Links to Additional Sources (1)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Texas
UP81884 • Found Jan 6, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 95%Est. 21–31 vs 20
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 months after last seen
Height 100%4'10"–5'2" vs 4'10"
79%Possible
John Doe — Texas - unidentified case UP97186
John Doe — Texas
UP97186 • Found Dec 9, 2017
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 12–20 vs 20
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 months after last seen
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP73055 • Found Jan 10, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 19–27 vs 20
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 months after last seen
Height 68%5'1"–5'5" vs 4'10"
76%Possible
John Doe — Mission, Texas
UP122149 • Found Apr 26, 2024
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 12–20 vs 20 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%6 mi away, same county
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 20%5'4" vs 4'10"
Weight 50%205 lb vs 155 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Hidalgo, Texas - unidentified case UP93259
John Doe — Hidalgo, Texas
UP93259 • Found Jun 28, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 20 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%7 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 52%5'2" vs 4'10"
Weight 0%77 lb vs 155 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
75%Possible
John Doe — Mission, Texas
UP81370 • Found May 23, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 16–29 vs 20 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%3 mi away, same county
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 0%5'6" vs 4'10"
Weight 100%167 lb vs 155 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
75%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP82407 • Found Dec 18, 2019
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 14–20 vs 20 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%43 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 52%5'2"–5'11" vs 4'10"
75%Possible
John Doe — Three Rivers, Texas - unidentified case UP72476
John Doe — Three Rivers, Texas
UP72476 • Found Sep 11, 2019
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 17–26 vs 20 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 64%156 mi away, same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%4'8"–5'0" vs 4'10"
75%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP58809 • Found Jan 7, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 72%Est. 23–37 vs 20
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 91%44 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 months after last seen
Height 84%5'0"–5'5" vs 4'10"
75%Possible
John Doe — Texas
UP17031 • Found Sep 6, 2017
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–39 vs 20
Race 60%White
Location 98%18 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 months after last seen
Height 84%5'0" vs 4'10"
Hair 100%Black vs Black

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.