Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Sherman Jennings:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I was reading through some old articles about Sherman Jennings' case, and one detail that stood out to me was the use of the pay phone at the Euclid trolley station. It makes me wonder if there were any cameras in the vicinity at that time. In 1999, surveillance wasn't as widespread as it is today, but that area seems like it could have had some coverage, given the station's traffic. Maybe a commuter or someone nearby saw something that seemed insignificant at the time but could provide a lead now. It's really upsetting to think about how these little details can hold the key to solving a case like this. I can't imagine the pain his family has gone through all these years without answers. They deserve closure, and any new insight could finally lead to justice for Sherman. Anyone else have thoughts or insights on the use of the pay phone that night?
I’ve been diving into the details of Sherman Jennings' murder, and something that strikes me is the use of the pay phone at the Euclid trolley station. In 1999, pay phones were more common, but using one might suggest premeditation or an attempt to avoid leaving a trace. Could it be that "Kevin Brown" was a name just picked at random to throw off investigators? I always feel for the families grappling with missing pieces in cases like this. It's baffling how someone could do this and vanish without a trace. I hope advancements in technology, like DNA or phone record analysis, can shed some light on this tragic event. Anyone else wonder if the location of that pay phone was significant?
Hey everyone,
I’ve been looking into the Sherman Jennings case again, and something that sticks out to me is the location of the pay phone at the Euclid trolley station. This is San Diego in '99 we're talking about, so it seems significant that whoever called him used a public phone. Was this an intentional move to avoid leaving a personal trace, or just the only option at that time of night? I know pay phones were more common back then, but this just feels deliberate, like they were trying to cover their tracks.
It’s hard not to think about the kind of person who would plan out something so coldly, not just to murder but to think ahead about leaving no evidence in the form of a phone record. It must be incredibly tough for Sherman’s family to think about these sorts of details, wondering who this Kevin Brown could be, and whether he’s still out there somewhere. I hope any new look into cases like this takes a hard look at where technology can help fill in the gaps.
Has anyone come across similar tactics used in other cases or any theories on who this caller could be and why they would choose a pay phone? Would love to hear your thoughts.
Sending support and strength to Sherman’s family. Let's keep sharing ideas to hopefully bring some closure.
Stay safe, everyone.